Memo

To the InstructorIntroduction to Argument Analysis UnitHaving reviewed the clause titled The End Is non At Hand - by Robert J Samuelson published in Newsweek magazine in 1992 , I realise worked in groups and take for provided answers to the questions on public debate analysis of the article . This memo contains the answersWrite a 1-3 sentence summary of what you think Robert J . Samuelson is arguing for (or againstRobert Samuelson strongly argues against exaggerated claims of an impending end of life on the orbiter made by fundamental environmentalists . His concern is that the shortens raised more than or less environmental degradation argon not at compargon with the real picture . He emphasizes the exigency to balance the issue against the backdrop of economic growth and informationDo you adjust Samuelson s argument c ompelling ? If you find him persuasive what is it you find more or less compelling more or less the argument ? If you do not find him to be win over , what aspects of the argument do you find most problematicNo , I take up t find him persuasive . He keeps giving irrelevant examples and compares events and constituent that do not share different value . He is stereotyped to his economic values and sees problem from a materialistic viewpoint rather than a holistic view : he thinks economy is more important and should be compared with such immensely salient issue as the nominate of the environment . He is quite myopic in his viewHow does Samuelson use logic to second-stringer his audience ? That is , where in the argument is he toilsome to scrap to the audience s sense of rationalness argon the licit appeals effectiveHe appeals to dry land through use of statistical date as quarter for his argument . Many a statistics he used are not part of the holistic idea he refu sed to telling they are selections of insi! nuating info without proof nor strong support for his lieu .

He also tried to argue his viewpoint as organismness understanding and balanced in that he considers the secernate of the buzz offing nations , their economy and economic growth in develop nations as issue of parallel importance to environment atomic number 18 the legitimate appeals effectiveNo , the logical appeals are not effective as the statistical data was not entirely relevant with his argument . Instead of being balanced , he positioned his bias in the introduction , laughable supports for it with his presumptuous statistical data and even while he concluding , wh at is also obvious is his `hatred for environmentalistHow does Samuelson use admirer to persuade his audience ? That is , where in the argument is he severe to appeal to the audience s emotions ? Which emotions does he try to evoke ? Are these emotional appeals effective Why ? Why notSamuelson , in this article , portrays environmentalist as trying to frighten and scare us rather than inform us . He links pederastic misery and death in developing country to hang economic growth and increased environmental degradation . He also downplays the impact of environmental degradation by linking assume obnoxious terms to describe the extreme environmentalismAre these emotional appeals...If you penury to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay